deCODED?
A new map of the human genome should help both doctors and biologists
Archive for June, 2002

78312550
June 28, 2002
78269167
June 27, 2002Will R&D Make Merck Hot Again?
The drug giant gets out of the prescription business and bets it all on science.

78225030
June 26, 2002Cracking the cancer code
Whether a tumor invades the lung or breast is beside the point. Its genetic activity will dictate how to attack it

78178130
June 25, 2002Report raps drug firms’ ‘post-approval’ studies
Drug manufacturers spent $1.5 billion in 2000 to test medicines already approved by the Food and Drug Administration primarily so they could make new marketing claims to sell their products, industry specialists said this week. Critics say the trend inflates health care costs while undercutting the integrity of research.

78144126
June 24, 2002Of Clones and Clowns A distinguished molecular biologist discusses the “cloning circus” and the damage it is doing to serious research

77991555
June 20, 2002Legal Circumvention
Molecular switches provide a route around existing gene patents

77944518
June 19, 20025 Big Drug Companies Face R&D Drought
Five of the world’s biggest drug companies do not have any potential billion-dollar drugs in late-stage development, highlighting the industry’s current poor R&D productivity, according to a report released on Wednesday.

77936231
June 19, 2002Informatics Moves to the Head of the Class – Archive
The race is on to increase the quantity and quality of bio-IT training programs as government and academia bet the need will be great. Will the job market back that up?

77894548
June 18, 2002Nanopharmaceuticals Open Up Brand New Field Of Study
Drug-binding molecules tiny enough to travel through the body’s smallest capillaries may provide a way to spare the heart and other organs from the toxic effects of drug overdose.

77871118
June 17, 2002Networked Pharma
The pharmaceutical industry is experiencing a deepening productivity crisis. The industry’s preferred escape mechanism from this predicament has been to increase investment in current business activities—primarily R&D and sales—to sustain productivity levels or, ideally, to exploit economies of scale. This has been implemented through organic growth of critical resources and/or M&A. The fact that productivity continues to decline after a decade of vigorous growth in investment levels, and against a background of increasing company size, bears testament to the fallibility of this strategy.
